 |
Work Item Reference | ETSI Doc. Number |
STF | Technical Body in Charge |
Standard Not Ready For Download |
||
| RTS/ESI-0019101v121 | TS 119 101 | ESI | |||||
| Current Status (Click to View Full Schedule) |
Latest Version |
Cover Date | Standstill | Creation Date | |||
|
|
View Standstill Information | 2018-12-21 | |||||
| Rapporteur | Technical Officer | Harmonised Standard | |||||
Andrea Rock
|
Sonia Compans
|
No | |||||
| Title |
Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy and security requirements for applications for signature creation and signature validation Policy and Security Requirements for Electronic Signature Creation and Validation |
||||||
|
Scope and Field of Application |
After the publication of several documents related to TS 119 101, especially TS 119 441 and TS 119 431-2, an update is needed. The following points should be considered: 1) adapt definitions (signature creation/validation policy, signature acceptance rules, ...) to take into account the value used in TS 119 441, TS 119 102-2 and TS 119 431-1/2. 2) replace the signature (validation) practice statement"by a concept more adapted to an application, e.g. an "application statement". A signature (validation) practice statement is too TSP oriented. Also the ToC should be updated to reflect latest discussions. 3) Some clauses are redundant between TS 119 441/TS 119 431 and TS 119 101, e.g. ISMS requirements. It need to be decided if such clauses are kept on the TSP level (i.e. practice statement) and/or at the level of the signature validation application implemented by the TSP (i.e. application statement) 4) Review the TS 119 101 with the distinction of TSP / Application in mend to validate that the requirements are in the right document. - TS 119 101 proposes a “signature (validation) practice statements” that should be replaced by a concept more adapted to an application (now too TSP oriented). E.g. “application” statement. Also the ToC for “signature validation practice statements” is not fully aligned with the STF discussions. - Some clauses are redundant between 119 441 and 119 101, (e.g. ISMS reqs). One needs to decide if such clause is to be at the TSP level (i.e. practice statements) and/or at the level of the signature validation application implemented by the TSP (i.e. application statement). - a general review with this TSP / Application distinction in mind to validate that the requirements are in the right document. |
||||||
|
Supporting Organizations |
Cryptolog International, InfoCert s.p.a., eWitness S.A., Sealed sprl, TIMT, Logalty | ||||||
